Toxicity profile of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors in real-time clinical practice
https://doi.org/10.62546/3034-1477-2025-3-2-15-24
Abstract
Background. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors are a standard of care for ER-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC), yet real-world safety may differ from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Objective. To assess the safety of palbociclib and ribociclib combined with endocrine therapy in routine clinical practice.
Methods. Prospective, open-label, single-center, non-randomized study including 815 patients treated between April 2020 and October 2023. Palbociclib cohort: n=365 (125 mg QD, 21/7); ribociclib cohort: n=450 (600 mg QD, 21/7). Adverse events (AEs) were graded by CTCAE v5.0; standard statistics with p<0.05.
Results. Any-grade AEs occurred in 33.4% (palbociclib) and 24.0% (ribociclib). Toxicity spectra differed: palbociclib was associated mainly with hematologic AEs—neutropenia in 112/365 (30.7%), including grade 3–4 in 37/365 (10.1%); febrile neutropenia in 1/365 (0.3%). Ribociclib showed predominantly non-hematologic AEs — asthenia in 34/450 (7.6%) (mostly grade ≤2); ALT/AST elevations in 16/450 (3.6%); QT interval prolongation in 2/450 (0.4%). Diarrhea and rash were uncommon in both cohorts. Dose reductions implemented for toxicity did not compromise progression-free survival in within-group comparisons.
Conclusions. In real-world practice, CDK4/6 inhibitors demonstrate favorable tolerability with predictable, distinct toxicity patterns (hematologic with palbociclib; mainly non-hematologic with ribociclib), supporting individualized drug selection and safety monitoring strategies.
About the Authors
R. V. OrlovaRussian Federation
Rashida V. Orlova
7/9 Universitetskaya Emb., St. Petersburg, 199034
56 Veteranov Ave., St. Petersburg, 193318
I. V. Avramenko
Russian Federation
Inna V. Avramenko
56 Veteranov Ave., St. Petersburg, 193318
A. V. Androsova
Russian Federation
Aleksandra V. Androsova
7/9 Universitetskaya Emb., St. Petersburg, 199034
56 Veteranov Ave., St. Petersburg, 193318
E. E. Topuzov
Russian Federation
Eldar E. Topuzov
56 Veteranov Ave., St. Petersburg, 193318
Kirochnaya Street, 41, St. Petersburg 191015
N P. Belyak
Russian Federation
Natalia P. Belyak
7/9 Universitetskaya Emb., St. Petersburg, 199034
56 Veteranov Ave., St. Petersburg, 193318
S. I. Kutukova
Russian Federation
Svetlana I. Kutukova
6–8 L. Tolstoy Str., St. Petersburg 197022
A. A. Varankina
Russian Federation
Anna A. Varankina
56 Veteranov Ave., St. Petersburg, 193318
A. A. Vakhitova
Russian Federation
Almira A. Vakhitova
56 Veteranov Ave., St. Petersburg, 193318
M. I. Gluzman
Russian Federation
Mark I. Gluzman
7/9 Universitetskaya Emb., St. Petersburg, 199034
56 Veteranov Ave., St. Petersburg, 193318
References
1. Каприн А.Д., Старинский В.В., Шахзадова А.О. (ред.). Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2022 году (заболеваемость и смертность). М.: МНИОИ им. П. А. Герцена — филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России, 2023.
2. Finn R.S., Crown J.P., Lang I. et al. The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone as first-line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1/TRIO-18): a randomised phase 2 study // Lancet. Oncol. 2015. Vol. 16. Р. 25–35.
3. Finn R.S., Martin M., Rugo H.S. et al. Palbociclib and Letrozole in Advanced Breast Cancer // N. Engl. J. Med. 2016. Vol. 375, No. 20. Р. 1925–1936.
4. Hortobagyi G.N., Stemmer S.M., Burris H.A. et al. Ribociclib as First-Line Therapy for HR-Positive, Advanced Breast Cancer // N. Engl. J. Med. 2016. Vol. 375. Р. 1738–1748.
5. Hortobagyi G.N., Stemmer S.M., Burris H.A. et al. Updated results from MONALEESA-2, a phase 3 trial of first-line ribociclib + letrozole in hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2–), advanced breast cancer (ABC) // J. Clin. Oncol. 2017. Vol. 35 (15 suppl). Р. 1038.
6. Goetz M.P., Toi M., Campone M. et al. MONARCH 3: Abemaciclib as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer // J. Clin. Oncol. 2017. Vol. 35. Р. 3638–3646.
7. Di Leo A., Toi M., Campone M. et al. MONARCH 3: Abemaciclib as initial therapy for patients with HR+/HER2-advanced breast cancer. Presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology 2017 Congress; Madrid; Sep 8–12, 2017. Abstr 236O.
8. Sledge G.W., Jr., Toi M., Neven P. et al. MONARCH 2: Abemaciclib in combination with fulvestrant in women with HR+/HER2– advanced breast cancer who had progressed while receiving endocrine therapy // J. Clin. Oncol. 2017. Vol. 35. Р. 2875–2884.
9. Dickler M.N., Tolaney S.M., Rugo H.S. et al. MONARCH 1, a phase II study of abemaciclib, a CDK4 and CDK6 inhibitor, as a single agent, in patients with refractory HR(+)/HER2(-) metastatic breast cancer // Clin. Cancer Res. 2017. Vol. 23. Р. 5218–5224.
10. Barroso-Sousa R., Shapiro G.I., Tolaney S.M. Clinical development of the CDK4/6 inhibitors ribociclib and abemaciclib in breast cancer // Breast Care (Basel). 2016. Vol. 11. Р. 167–173.
11. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0. Published: November 27, 2017.
12. Charlson M.E., Pompei P., Ales K.L., MacKenzie C.R. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation // J. Chronic. Dis. 1987. Vol. 40, No. 5. Р. 373–383.
Review
For citations:
Orlova R.V., Avramenko I.V., Androsova A.V., Topuzov E.E., Belyak N.P., Kutukova S.I., Varankina A.A., Vakhitova A.A., Gluzman M.I. Toxicity profile of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors in real-time clinical practice. Clinical Case in Oncology. 2025;3(2):15-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.62546/3034-1477-2025-3-2-15-24